← ELI5 中文
EXPLAIN LIKE I'M 5

What is
Schrödinger's cat,
really?

For anyone who's curious
No. 149Nature & SciencePart 22 of 22Inspired by RedditFact-checked Oct 9, 2026
Video2:39 · English voice (AI) · English subtitles

Can't play sound? The illustrated version is right below.

Read the transcript

The full narration of the video.

A lot of people think Schrödinger said: the cat in the box is both dead and alive. Actually, he told this story to poke fun at an idea. In 1935, the physicist Erwin Schrödinger described a box in a paper. He never built it. It was an experiment in his head.

Inside: a cat and a tiny bit of radioactive stuff. A detector, a little hammer, and a small vial of poison. Within one hour, there's a fifty-fifty chance that one atom suddenly breaks apart. If it breaks, the detector clicks. The hammer drops, the vial shatters, and the cat dies. If it doesn't, the cat lives.

Close the lid. Wait an hour. Is the cat dead or alive? You'd say: it's one or the other, we just don't know yet. Open the lid and look. But many physicists back then said that something as small as an atom, while no one is looking, is neither broken nor whole. It's both possibilities stacked together.

That's not a wild guess. Send electrons through two slits one at a time. The dots pile up into stripes, as if each one took both paths at once. So Schrödinger asked: fine, the atom is stacked. Then what about the detector, the hammer, and the vial that follow it? And the cat? By that logic, the cat is half living cat and half dead cat, smeared together until someone opens the lid.

He himself called it a ridiculous case. His point: move that idea up to a cat, and it falls apart. So the real question is: small things can be stacked, and cats seem not to be. Where exactly is the line? Many scientists today answer: a cat simply can't keep a secret.

A cat is made of countless atoms. They're constantly bumping into air and light. Every bump leaves a footprint. The stacked state falls apart in a blink, long before you open the lid. But why does it end up as this outcome and not the other? Scientists are still arguing about that. Here's the fun part: scientists keep making stacked things bigger. In 1999, it was a tiny ball made of sixty carbon atoms.

In 2023, a lab in Switzerland took a sixteen-microgram crystal and made it shake in two opposite rhythms at once. It weighs about as much as a fine grain of sand. That's still a long way from a cat. But this cat on paper, for over ninety years, has kept scientists moving forward. What science idea still makes no sense to you? Tell me in the comments.

"Dead and alive"
wasn't his point

A lot of people think the physicist Erwin Schrödinger said that the cat in the box is both dead and alive.

Actually, he told
this story to poke fun
at an idea.

In 1935, he described this box in a paper. He never built it — it was an experiment done only in his head, a "thought experiment."

Five things in the box

A cat, a tiny bit of radioactive stuff, a detector, a little hammer, and a small vial of poison.

How tiny is that bit of radioactive stuff? Within one hour, there's a fifty-fifty chance that a single atom suddenly breaks apart.

If it breaks, the detector clicks, the hammer drops, the vial shatters, and the cat dies. If it doesn't, the cat lives.

Close the lid. Wait an hour.
Is the cat dead or alive?

You'd probably say: it's one or the other, we just don't know yet. Open the lid and look.

That atom really can be
"two ways at once"

But many physicists back then said that something as small as an atom, while no one is looking, is neither broken nor whole. It's both possibilities stacked together.

That's not a wild guess. Send electrons through two slits one at a time, collect the dots one by one, and they pile up into stripes — as if each electron took both paths at once.

In 1989, Akira Tonomura's team at Hitachi in Japan filmed exactly that, one electron at a time. Tiny things do plenty of other strange stuff, too — like a magnet that moves electrons without touching them.

So are the hammer,
the vial and the cat stacked too?

So Schrödinger asked: fine, the atom is stacked. Then what about the detector, the hammer and the vial that follow it — and the cat?

By that logic,
the cat is half living
and half dead, smeared
together until someone
opens the lid.

He himself called it a "ridiculous case." His point: move that idea up to a cat, and it falls apart.

So the real question is: small things can be stacked, and cats seem not to be. Where exactly is the line?

A cat can't keep a secret

Many scientists today answer like this: a cat is made of countless atoms, constantly bumping into air and light.

Every bump is like leaving a footprint outside the cat. The world around it has already "taken note" of whether the cat is dead or alive.

The stacked state falls
apart in a blink, long
before you open the lid.

But why does it end up as this outcome and not the other? Scientists are still arguing about that.

Stacked things keep
getting bigger

198919992023?

In 1999, scientists in Vienna got a tiny ball made of sixty carbon atoms to make stripes too.

In 2023, a lab in Zurich, Switzerland, got a sixteen-microgram crystal to shake in two opposite rhythms at once — about the weight of a fine grain of sand.

That's still a long way
from a cat.
But this cat on paper has kept
scientists moving for over ninety years.
Made by Samshang × Maddox
Sources:
Schrödinger, "Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik," Naturwissenschaften 23, 1935; Trimmer's English translation, "The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics," Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, 1980 (the box setup, the one-hour fifty-fifty chance, "quite ridiculous cases," living and dead cat "mixed or smeared in equal parts")
American Physical Society classroom material "Save Schrödinger's Cat"; arXiv 2309.06387, "The life and entangled adventures of Schrödinger's cat" (sparked by the EPR paper that year and his letters with Einstein; a critique of the mainstream view of the time)
Tonomura et al., "Demonstration of single-electron buildup of an interference pattern," American Journal of Physics 57, 1989
Arndt, Zeilinger et al., "Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules," Nature 401, 1999
Bild, Chu et al., "Schrödinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator," Science 380, 2023; ETH Zurich press release "Fat quantum cats"
University of Colorado PHYS 3220 quantum mechanics notes (big objects keep bumping into their surroundings, so the stacked state quickly becomes undetectable; this doesn't explain which outcome we get)
UP NEXT

What Is a Debris Flow? A Mountain That Flows

Not just "too much water": a whole gully of rock, mud and water that moves like wet concrete. What it is, the warning signs, and which way to run.

No. 9 · 4 minKeep going →
← Back to ELI5